Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Berkley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:09, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Susan Berkley

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

not notable; the ref links to a short news clip that does not feature Susan Berkley at all (it features Pat Fleet, who is mentioned briefly in this article)  Chzz  ►  22:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Arguably breaches WP:ATTACK in that the article seems to accuse her of misrepresenting herself. On top of this she is marginally notable at best. -- Mattinbgn\talk 22:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable third-party sources given, living person of minor notability - that equals delete for me. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 23:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete ASAP The nasty tone of this article has been removed:here but I hardly think this article's creator Lexlex has Susan Berkley's best intentions at heart in making this article. This appears to be a character assassination Also much of the info is from her web site which cannot be considered a WP:RS. Artene50 (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

'Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks!' -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:09, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.