Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Del Percio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Not exactly unanimous but IMO the weight of consensus and argument favors Keep. If this were the first review I'd relist it. But after three relists it's time to for a judgement call and that's mine. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Susan Del Percio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a political consultant, which is (a) written more like the sell-yourself pitch at the top of a LinkedIn profile than anything resembling an actual encyclopedia article, and (b) parked on a single primary source rather than any evidence of reliable source coverage about her. As always, political campaign strategists do not get an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing; they must be the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 02:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment a mistaken tweet by a politician referenced her. . She also sometimes writes articles for newspapers.
 * A person gets a Wikipedia article by being the subject of coverage in reliable sources, not by being the author of media content or by getting tweeted about. Bearcat (talk) 03:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict)Weak keep For what it is worth, there seems to be a lot of hits in reliable sources for her name in search engines. LBHS Cheerleader (talk) 02:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * There seem to be a fair number of hits in reliable sources which glancingly namecheck her existence in coverage of other subjects; there do not seem to be any significant number of hits in reliable sources which have her as their subject. Bearcat (talk) 03:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Since she is a long time political consultant, there are many passing mentions of her, and brief quotes of her doing her job, and tweets. Today, for example, she is irritated at a hotel with broken air conditioning. But I have been unable to find any significant coverage of her that demonstrates that she is notable. As always, I will change my mind if someone brings forward solid sources and adds a few good references to the article. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Your request is reasonable, so I ran a search with "Cuomo" as a keyword to see if there were "solid sources and added a few good references", found some, and added them to the article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:19, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   12:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   12:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   12:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 02:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete. There seems to be a lot of coverage by unreliable sources on both sides of the aisle. The few reliable sources give no more content than has already been revealed in this discussion (like ). But there are a LOT of unreliable sources covering her. The one incident with the like susan del percio hot tweet isn't enough per BLP1EVENT.&thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 03:00, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep (No way this fits BLP1EVENT) Political consultant who has been a regular panelist/commentator on PoliticsNation with Al Sharpton, MSNBC’s The Dylan Ratigan Show, NY1, and Politico.  A gNews search on her name is persuasive .  I have sourced the outline of her career to reliable daily newspapers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep- Subject has had significant coverage by reliable sources, not just passing comments, which makes her notable. Reworked the article plus removed a social media link. Easily passes WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 18:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.