Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan E. Roberts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:37, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Susan E. Roberts

 * – ( View AfD View log

I created this page for Susan Roberts when I worked at WPRI 12 in Providence, RI. Neither she nor I currently work there. She recently contacted me and asked me to take the page down. She no longer works in television news and is no longer in the public eye. However, I don't have access to the email address used to create the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nekrause1219 (talk • contribs)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp×g 03:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: This AfD was created some time in April 2022, but was never listed on a daily logpage; I am formatting it to relist now. jp×g 03:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, as a BLP of borderline notability who requests deletion (per WP:BLPREQUEST). jp×g 03:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm wondering about this deletion of content and wondering if the subject is still working for CGTN America and this is an attempt to 'sanitize' their online footprint. Also as the creating account does not match the nominator, G7 cannot be applied.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:23, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, but even in that revision, it doesn't look like there is a whole lot of notability. jp×g 05:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Just trying to do my full diligence, but yes, otherwise it's a delete for me due to a lack of N.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism,  and Louisiana. Shellwood (talk) 07:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete She is not very notable. We should value privacy. Delete as per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE CT55555 (talk) 14:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable fails gng.Henriklars (talk) 08:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete a person who never actually made any significant contributions to media. We should have never had this article in the first place, the subject very clearly never met our inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Her regional Emmy nominations show some significant contributions. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)


 * keep as 2 regional Emmy nominations meets notability guidelines. Improve, but keep. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.