Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Fuhrman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nominator has withdrawn but this discussion has been open long enough and has enough participation for a "keep" close. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Susan Fuhrman

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete per WP:PROF. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I wish to withdraw my nomination for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:14, 10 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Speedy Keep. She's the President of Teacher's College, a semi-autonomous prt of Columbia University, which is enough significance to meet WP PROF. And her notable role in the profession is shown by her publication record, including multiple widely-held books . All the article needs is expansion and referencing.    DGG ( talk ) 01:21, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 03:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. I consider the WP:PROF #6 argument to be completely convincing, but she's also been named one of New York's 100 most influential women in a magazine article (now included), so I think there's a clear pass of WP:BIO more generally. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Does president of the National Academy of Education also count for WP:PROF #6 (president of an important society) or #7 (an important consulting role on national primary and secondary school education issues)? Maybe both. And why is National Academy of Education a redlink? In any case this is well into speedy keep territory. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for above good reasons. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC).
 * Strong Keep for above good reasons. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.