Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Lark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. StarM 22:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Susan Lark

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Only claim of notability is being 'featured' in newspapers and magazines, but can't find any references to her in the newspapers listed. Fails WP:BIO. ninety:one 22:17, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - And your point is? I thought that one of the primary reason for inclusion in Wikipedia under the guideline of /Notable was; "... being 'featured' in newspapers and magazinesis" as Dr. Lark is shown to be here . ShoesssS Talk 23:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * All but one of which are press releases, which as per Notability do not count as reliable sources. ninety:one 21:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm sorry, I believe you looked at just the first page where several of the articles are press releases. However, I believe once you scan pages 2 through 17 you will find more than a handful of independent - 3rd party sources.  Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 05:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article is about a notable subject, but it needs to be cleaned up.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per nom . Being "featured" in newspapers and magazines is indication of notability per WP:NOTABILITY.   Since the nom for some reason couldn't find any these features, here are some ...  --Oakshade (talk) 04:28, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.