Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Lewis (writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. &mdash; Scientizzle 13:50, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Susan Lewis (writer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No assertion of notability per WP:AUTHOR; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested by creator. Gurt Posh (talk) 15:43, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  —Gurt Posh (talk) 15:43, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)




 * Keep: a large body of popular genre fiction, published by the UK subsidiary of Random House. MarkBernstein (talk) 22:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: I presume because of changes since the nomination, but the article claims she is best-selling author and at least has some citation to that effect.--Milowent • talkblp-r 19:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Guardian calls her a "bestselling author", and that's probably enough to rate marginal notability in my book. Herostratus (talk) 07:21, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.