Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Rebecca Cooper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:59, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Susan Rebecca Cooper

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article about a subject that does not meet WP:GNG. I can't find any coverage that is better than a mere-mention or a quote of the subject. The article asserts that the subject has won two Emmy awards. However, these, Emmys were for films that Cooper produced, and Cooper is not credited in the award announcements, so I don't know that they're enough to meet WP:ANYBIO in the absence of any coverage. Finally, while deletion is not cleanup, it is worth noting that the article is written in a very promotional manner and primarily cites press releases–not quite enough to justify CSD G11 IMO, but not a good sign for the subject's notability. signed,Rosguill talk 22:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:OUTCOMES and WP:MILL. We almost always delete articles for producers, who are run of the mill, unless they receive awards or significant notoriety. Bearian (talk) 18:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.