Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Shacter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:30, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Susan Shacter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

When an article about a photographer is "successfully deorphaned" merely by its addition to the article List of photographers, my hunch is that something's wrong. And so it turns out. Shacter is a skilled portraitist, but the world seems to have paid little attention (also try your search engine), and much of the content of this stub has been marked "Citation needed" since 2010. Hoary (talk) 01:00, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 01:08, 30 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Doesn't seem to have received the level of coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. PohranicniStraze (talk) 01:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Agreed, my search engine says no. -Lopifalko (talk) 04:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:22, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:22, 30 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete It isn't true that the world has paid little attention to Shacter. Definitely a successful working photographer with many credits in major publications, and who has been quoted as an expert in photography, but to meet WP:GNG she would have to be the main subject of significant coverage that is specifically about her. For photography or WP:ARTIST specific notability, she would have to have received a major award or made a unique contribution to her field or school or had a major solo show of her work in a significant museum or gallery. I'd support keeping if I saw a good faith citation of meeting any one of these criteria. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:10, 30 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.