Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Stamper Brown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Potentially could become notable some day, but right now consensus agrees that is not right now. Can be restored at WP:DRV should that day arrive. — foxj 23:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Susan Stamper Brown

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )



The subject appears to fail the criteria at the relevant notability guideline, WP:JOURNALIST. VQuakr (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The subject fits the criteria of relevant notability guideline. Was ranked 41st best conservative columnist for 2016. Bill Kristol was ranked #42. Wikimeeeeeee (talk) 23:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC) The subject fits the criteria at the relevant notability guidelineWP:JOURNALIST based on WP definition "Depending on the context, the term journalist may include various types of editors, editorial writers, columnists, and visual journalists, such as photojournalists (journalists who use the medium of photography)." Wikimeeeeeee (talk) 22:11, 28 April 2017 (UTC) The subject fits the criteria at the relevant notability guideline based on Google search hits on 2017 April 28 at 3,400,000 as compared to conservative columnist Michelle Malkin at 488,000 and leftwing Froma Harrop at 62,500. Wikimeeeeeee (talk) 22:11, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   22:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:RUNOFTHEMILL journalist who does not meet relevant notability criteria. --bonadea contributions talk 06:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

It is wise to consider that WP loses credibility if bias (left or right wing) influences deletion decisions. Wikimeeeeeee (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2017 (UTC) — Wikimeeeeeee (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Dloh cierekim  16:50, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Doubt Wikipedia has any credibility to lose, as I am constantly told how unreliable it is. We discarded google-count or # of G-hits as a measure of notability a decade ago. Dloh cierekim  02:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * delete per nom and per Bonadea. Links to her byline or the outlet she writes for are not reliable sources independent of the subject. Links to her writings ditto. The award is far less significant that it would appear, and does not appear unconnected to the subject. WP:Gale search was unavailing. This looks like a clever promotional piece designed to promote her and her work. it is not referenced to WP:RS. As far as our reputation goes, it suffers when we fail to remove articles about non notable subjects that are promotional by nature. And the hallmark of a correct decision is the cries of "BIAS!" from those who cannot see an article objectively. Dloh  cierekim  03:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.