Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Tanner (diplomat)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:44, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Susan Tanner (diplomat)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails WP:BIO for lack of third party coverage. Only primary sources provided. LibStar (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete unless references to significant coverage by reliable, independent sources are provided. The two press releases used as references are inadequate to establish notability. Cullen328 (talk) 03:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Bilateral relations,  and Australia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:58, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Spain and Chile. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 05:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza<b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d  c̄ ) 05:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - GA Melbourne (talk) 14:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, regretfully. If sources are found and the article is improved, consider this a keep. I wouldn't mind if the article is recreated if new material surfaces, either. Bedivere (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per WP:HEY. I've amended the page and added the 2004 event when she was summoned to Madrid by the Spanish government in protest to Alexander Downer's critical comments about Spain withdrawing military support from Iraq. That was well covered by RSs, however it possibly falls under WP:1EVENT? Also noting here that the | proposed notability guidelines for politicians identifies ambassadors as not being inherently notable. Cabrils (talk) 00:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Ambassadors are often summoned by governments whenever critical comments are made. The additional sources are not about Tanner as the subject. This article and this one only has a 1 line mention of Tanner. LibStar (talk) 01:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Came here from reading the WP:WIR board expecting to save the article but the coverage is woeful. The dressing down by the Spanish government, is totally insufficient coverage to satisfy WP:BIO or WP:SIGCOV. The before was mostly blank.    scope_creep Talk  02:56, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.