Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan bayh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. PeterSymonds (talk)  02:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Susan bayh

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not convinced she is notable enough for her own article - some minor press mentions, but they are all regarding the effect of her job on her husband's position. IMO, merits at best a mention in her husband's article Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge To husband's article. ukexpat (talk) 18:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Her status as a former First Lady of Indiana, and wife of a former presidential candidate/potential vice presidential candidate qualifies her for her own article. I would argue that her status as a director of several high-profile companies boosts her credentials to appear here. She is no different (and probably more prominent) than Ann Romney, Barbara Richardson, Mary Pawlenty, Jenny Sanford, or anyone else of that ilk.-Thirdreading (talk) 14:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * comment - WP:WAX says that other articles can not be used for comparisons of the meritis of an AfD discussion. The discussion must be about this article only. --triwbe (talk) 19:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to her husband's article, since notability is not inherited or bestowed by marriage. Edison (talk) 20:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I think there is enough about her that's worthy of her own article. Thirdreading had a lot right about what he said.-- Bedford  Pray  03:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep ample reliable and verifiable sources to satisfy the Notability standard as an independent article. Alansohn (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Bedford and Alansohn above--there is enough sourced info here to qualify her for both notability and and verifiability. --Eastlaw (talk) 00:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I would also like to add that I have cleaned up the article a bit since this nomination was made. --Eastlaw (talk) 00:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.