Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sushi Kaneyoshi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Sushi Kaneyoshi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. References are PR and clickbait sites.  scope_creep Talk  11:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and California. Shellwood (talk) 11:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Snow keep Nominator is WP:WIKIHOUNDING KINGofLETTUCE 👑  🥬 18:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep, but this article needs serious work to make the notability clear. This is a very poor article. The Banner  talk 19:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Some more very poor "articles": Lazy Bear, Morihiro (restaurant), Q Sushi, Phenakite (restaurant), Shibumi (restaurant), Kali (restaurant), Gwen (restaurant), Osteria Mozza, Nozawa Bar, Camphor (restaurant), Commis (restaurant), Taco María, Sushi Tadokoro, Jeune et Jolie (restaurant), Soichi (restaurant). I draftified them when they only had the single Bon Appétit source and the creator promptly moved them back. Adding a source or two still doesn't mean we should have copy-paste one-sentence crap in main space though. Reywas92Talk 14:20, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Feel free to add notability tags or nominate for deletion. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * So then you can complain you have to "drop everything" to make them into actual articles within a week? I don't care if sources exist, don't make junk one-liners. Reywas92Talk 16:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Acknowledging your request for me to stop creating stubs, I'd argue adding tags prompts action and is more constructive than attempting to mass delete entries about notable topics. We don't have to agree. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep to Neutral ( Updated per below comment by nominator. ) This is an one star Michelin restaurant. Per WP:CORPDEPTH, If the list itself is notable, such as the Fortune 500 and the Michelin Guide, the inclusion counts like any other reliable source, but it does not exempt the article from the normal value of providing evidence that independent sources discuss the subject, therefore I disagree that this reference is PR or clickbait. Unfortunately lots of sources are listicles but Time Out has a lengthy review that appears to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The New York Times also appears to cover this in three paragraphs, so it's probably debatable regarding whether CORPDEPTH is met. With those two references that count towards CORPDEPTH IMO and one being debatable, I currently am at neutral to weak keep.  VickKiang  (talk)  06:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment As it has a single Michelin star, it should have decent coverage and be notable. I'll take a look at these refs, later today/tonight. If they are decent, I will withdraw the nomination.   scope_creep Talk  10:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * To my opinion it is more a task for the original poster to improve the article and show the notability. In the present state, it is not really worth keeping. The Banner  talk 10:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Indeed, that is the way we do it.   scope_creep Talk  11:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep ɱ  (talk) 14:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.