Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sushma Berlia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:57, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Sushma Berlia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NonNotable Indian Businesslady. Uncletomwood (talk) 12:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:09, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as another classic example of there being nothing convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  01:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Some excellent articles covering her at the bottom of the page, with coverage I would definitely call significant and not trivial. The tagged issues at the top are pretty easy to clean up, especially since the page is currently such a short stub. Yvarta (talk) 12:28, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - went in cleaned up some. Yvarta (talk) 22:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Delete Apparently not the actual head of the university.  Notable as chancellor of Apeejay Stya University . But  the article was so promotional that it needs complete rewriting. Yvarta's cleanup helped, and I'm working on it.  DGG ( talk ) 23:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:49, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment, I'm a bit curious as to why we are using WP:PROF here. I went and looked up about the subject and it is clear that the subject is not an academic: they have not published any papers, they have not done any teaching. The university is a private university and the subject is the owner of the conglomerate which built the university. I'm hesitant to use WP:PROF here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:PROF criterion 6, "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society." There are two questions: First, is the university major enough, and I can understand thinking it is not, tho in practice we've extended this criterion down to some quite minor colleges. Second, is the position the actual head of a university. In many UK and UK related institutions it's the vice-chancellor who's the head.; in some US universities that are part of statewide systems the Chancellor is the head.  In this particular case, checking their website, the co-founders of the university hold the positions of chancellor and pro-chancellor; there is a vice-chancellor. Dr. S.K. Salwan. I see no organizational chart or equivalent, but reading the CV's, I think he's clearly the head (and should have an article).I changed my !vote accordingly., I give you my appreciation  for asking me to have another lookso I could correct my error. .  DGG ( talk ) 15:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you . And yes, I agree that Dr. S.K. Salwan should have an article as he seems to be noted for his work in the Indian government and he was formerly the Vice Chancellor of another state university Punjab Technical University . --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:36, 16 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete WP:PROF doesn't apply as the subject is not the actual head of the university. The sources about the subject which I found are mentions in context of news about the university or the conglomerate. Not independently notable, hence delete. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.