Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susie Abromeit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 07:00, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Susie Abromeit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per Deletion review/Log/2015 November 28, this article about an actress, previously speedily deleted per WP:CSD, is referred to AfD to determine the subject's notability. Note that the article was recreated after the speedy deletion; the previously deleted content can be seen in the history. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral.  Sandstein  12:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 15:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 15:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's of course a major series and a great hit, but nonetheless she does not play one of the major characters: the secretary to one of the major characters. The article on the series has one relevant ref. in addition to the one in this article, from Vivaglam,  "Meet Susie Abromeit of Netflix’s “Jessica Jones”["http://vivaglammagazine.com/meet-susie-abromeit-of-netflixs-jessica-jones/], which describes her as an "up-and-coming actress"  DGG ( talk ) 02:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep she has been cover by maxim under hot 10 and here  and here  though these are interviews.  Valoem   talk   contrib  03:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. She seems notable enough. -- Taku (talk) 04:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Jessica Jones for now perhaps as my searches found several mentions but perhaps nothing for better solid notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Why redirect to Jessica Jones, she was notable before that . Valoem   talk   contrib  18:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:BIO: "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Susie Abromeit does not have that, only really mild coverage at best. (With the links DGG and Valoem provided seeming iffy at best). And only recently because of a minor role in Jessica Jones. This really just seems like a user trying to create the article for her because they saw her in Jessica Jones and she didn't have a Wikipedia page, which probably lead to the thinking "She should have one, I'll create it." - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That's generally the reason why articles are created. Valoem   talk   contrib  04:57, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete The lede speculates that "She is perhaps best-known for..." Perhaps not. Perhaps she's barely known at all. All the information about her in this stub comes from a document which is not a reliable source. Some day, she may become notable. We'll be able to tell because she will have garnered significant coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of herself. Until then, this subject fails WP:GNG. David in DC (talk) 15:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * David in DC I provided sources above, I agree the one source in the article is bad, but we can fix this. Valoem   talk   contrib  15:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete While it's probably for the best that this is getting a full AFD rather than being speedied, neither notability nor substantial coverage by reliable sources are up to article standards at present. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not seeing the WP:RS to establish notability.   Mostly social networks, directories, that sort of thing, and those don't do it.  -- RoySmith (talk) 02:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.