Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susie Wiles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Susie Wiles

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unelected political consultant who has not held office. While apparently described by an Axios reporter as a 'top political adviser', we have no guidance that political consultants or, as they are known in the UK, SPADS are notable per WP:NPOL. Additionally, coverage does not lead to a pass of WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Seems like a case of WP:TOOSOON based on this CNN article. She will likely meet WP:GNG this time next year if the big man does pick her, but she's just not there at the moment. Curbon7 (talk) 04:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks like she's had coverage of her going back years, since she was in charge of DeSantis' campaign four years ago (and Trump's in 2016 too) and Romney's campaign before that. Here's some sources in addition to the three currently in the article:
 * And this was just a cursory look. There seems to be a lot more out there on her. Silver  seren C 05:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks SS. Unfortunately the nominator does not seem to have exercised their due diligence. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * And this was just a cursory look. There seems to be a lot more out there on her. Silver  seren C 05:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks SS. Unfortunately the nominator does not seem to have exercised their due diligence. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * And this was just a cursory look. There seems to be a lot more out there on her. Silver  seren C 05:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks SS. Unfortunately the nominator does not seem to have exercised their due diligence. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * And this was just a cursory look. There seems to be a lot more out there on her. Silver  seren C 05:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks SS. Unfortunately the nominator does not seem to have exercised their due diligence. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * And this was just a cursory look. There seems to be a lot more out there on her. Silver  seren C 05:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks SS. Unfortunately the nominator does not seem to have exercised their due diligence. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks SS. Unfortunately the nominator does not seem to have exercised their due diligence. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:52, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The numerous sources listed above by Silver seren provide more than enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 17:16, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep The sources found demonstrate that she meets GNG. Thriley (talk) 05:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women. Sal2100 (talk) 17:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)sig
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG per many above sources. W 42  18:18, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:BASIC per the sources provided by Silver Seren.4meter4 (talk) 18:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.