Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susning.nu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 02:27, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Susning.nu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:WEB. LiteralKa (talk) 11:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  --  N / A  0  17:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  --  N / A  0  17:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Needs a re-write and added sourcing not deletion. Known site in sweden. --BabbaQ (talk) 23:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:IKNOWIT is not a valid reason. Could you please provide actual examples of sources. Thanks LibStar (talk) 02:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong keep I get over a hundred hits when I search for "susning.nu" in Swedish (and Norwegian) newspaper articles (through Mediearkivet, "The Media Archive"). I haven't gone through them all, but one of the most recent hits was an article in Sydsvenskan (the major newspaper in southern Sweden), about Wikipedia turning ten years old, mentioning two competitors: Google Knol and susning.nu. (From a Swedish perspective, that makes perfect sense: susning.nu was the online encyclopedia here for a couple of years. Yes, WP:IKNOWIT, I know, I'm just trying to put my findings into perspective.) /Julle (talk) 20:42, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - The same as Julle. --NERIUM (talk) 19:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.