Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suspense Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nom (me) fail. Star  Mississippi  02:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Suspense Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Recently deleted via PROD (no issue with recreation), but my reason, Unable to identify independent reliable source coverage about the magazine. remains. They had reprints of notable authors, but I can find no evidence that the authors' inclusion was because the magazine was considered important, or other elements that would establish notability required. Star  Mississippi  01:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  01:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  01:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Magazines that printed stories by significant authors, like this one, warrant our coverage. Our articles on the history of science-fiction and related magazines are of an unusually high standard, which should not be damaged by creating an unnecessary gap in the coverage. Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. This may not be immediately apparent, but this article is not on the same magazine as the one that was deleted.  I was about to create this article when I saw the PROD so I waited in order to avoid creating an unnecessary disambig.  The magazine has an article about it in each of the two sources listed in the article; I think that gets us to the GNG. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 02:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I uh clearly need to not edit while half asleep because I thought I checked and clearly I didn't or looked at something incorrectly. I'm going to close this on that, and because I can count on one hand the mumber of other editors besides NYB I defer to. Thanks / apologies again. Star   Mississippi  02:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.