Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suspicionless Checkpoints - Random Bag Searches


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 11:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Suspicionless Checkpoints - Random Bag Searches

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is not an encyclopedia article, but an opinion piece. The article creator contested a prod. Lady of  Shalott  04:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't believe we had to take this one to AfD. The article is a pure rant. Encyclopedic discussion of these issues belong in articles like Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and search warrant, not here. Zachlipton (talk) 04:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Seconded. Moocha (talk) 04:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  —  Lady  of  Shalott  04:43, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  —  Lady  of  Shalott  04:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Yup -- That Guy, From That Show! 06:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article is actually pretty confusing; it feels like it was started in the middle of a news story.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 08:30, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * It orignially had a lead-section of sorts which made it clear that the remainder constitute examples of what the author was characterizing in the lead. If you look at the edit creating the article, the context (and just how much of an opinion piece it is) should become clear. Lady  of  Shalott  19:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.