Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Bolivia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Single-purpose account creation with a single self-published source; no sources found in seven days and unanimous consensus to delete. (non-admin closure) jp×g 22:44, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Sustainable Bolivia

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not a notable company, little to no other (non-primary) sources online TheManInTheBlackHat (talk) 20:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. TheManInTheBlackHat (talk) 20:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bolivia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zero sources. No media presence. Created by a WP:SPA. Suitskvarts (talk) 18:16, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete promo leaflet with no sources --多少 战场 龙 (talk) 13:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - laudable, but not notable. Bearian (talk) 20:53, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - insufficient coverage to warrant inclusion per N:ORG MaxnaCarta (talk) 06:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Some references exist Book, and this Case Study of an NGO and this. Do we have enough for a stub on this NGO? Bruxton (talk) 19:33, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.