Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Energy Now


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Sustainable Energy Now

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:ORG. nothing in gnews and nothing in a major Australian news website. those wanting to keep must show evidence of significant third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 07:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No doubt a laudable organization, but not notable since no significant independent coverage could be found. --MelanieN (talk) 21:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with the above statement. Not notable, no notable members, no notable activities, etc. Appears to be a well-meaning bunch of nobodies. Nath1991 (talk) 09:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 05:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Nom hit all of the right points. Article does not establish general notability due to the lack of reliable and verifiable third-party sources, instead relying on a link to the organization's website.  A quick Google search does not return anything useful. Logan Talk Contributions 12:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.