Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susun Weed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Susun Weed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable alt-med practitioner. Article fails GNG and BLP, and furthermore, is poorly written and cites no sources. A Google search resulted in no other reliable sources that cover the subject in-depth. Delta13C (talk) 19:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC) REALLY?! REALLY!?!? There is a huge discussion right now about how women editors and subjects are excluded from Wikipedia. Women are FIGHTING to have important women included in Wikipedia. This woman has written 5 books. What do you want???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? I am one of the very very few women editors on Wikipedia. But I have stopped editing because of stupid idiotic deletions like this. This is not only incredibly discouraging it fills me with rage. I fucking give up. -- CDA 15:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Procedural close There are 2 AFD discussions next to each other on the log, so one should be closed Seasider91 (talk) 19:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - BLP is unsourced and subject only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet the GNG criteria. We consider articles on people on the basis of sources covering them, not on emotional evaluation.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.