Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suture (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 09:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Suture (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BAND Onmyway22 (talk) 12:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Onmyway22 (talk) 12:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: This music group meets Wikipedia's notability criteria according to WP: Band. I added more references to make this clear. JamieT83 (talk) 14:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Aside from discogs, a well-sourced stub/short article about an important musical movement, and two of the principals. I considered a redirect to Kathleen Hanna, but, again, the article is too reliably sourced--and well written--for that, as well as being unfair to Cheslow. There are also mentions in books by Dave Thompson, The Wire, Riot Grrrl Revolution Girl Style Now!, and possibly Girls to the Front and The Riot Grrrl Collection. This may end up being more a referendum on the value of short, reliably sourced articles. (edit conflict) Caro7200 (talk) 14:04, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @Caro7200 I just added two of the books you mentioned. Thank you. JamieT83 (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to riot grrrl on the basis of how little Suture published. The reliable sources, which are fine, ensures that the information should be included in Wikipedia, but not automatically in its own article. Geschichte (talk) 21:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Agree on the value of short, reliably sourced articles. JamieT83 (talk) 23:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sufficient coverage to establish the significance of this group. --Michig (talk) 11:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.