Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suz Andreasen (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  qedk ( t  愛  c ) 06:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Suz Andreasen
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability since 2012. Sourcing is inadequate – no direct references in reliable sources. I couldn't find anything at Newspapers.com or NewspaperArchive. This person's parents were notable, but as things stand, I don't see any case for independent notability. Nick Number (talk) 23:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete inadequate sourcing to establish GNG. The article is like a box of Cracker Jack, with many small bits stuck together to give the appearance of a whole. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't find the Cracker Jack analogy particularly relevant. Bus stop (talk) 17:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Bus stop! great to see you! Having a good time commenting on talk pages?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'm not seeing anything to establish notability. Am also wondering why her father's obit is one of the sources, as notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Netherzone (talk) 16:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Nobody has argued that the subject's notability is dependent on the notability of the subject. Bus stop (talk) 17:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment I would like to see someone with subject area expertise evaluate the awards, before I !vote. I couldn't verify the claims to inclusion in the Smithsonian Institution and the other museum Schmuck Museum does not have digital records online, and while there isn't a en wiki page, there is a page on de wiki.--Theredproject (talk) 16:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Schmuckmuseum Pforzheim Bus stop (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Just noting that referring to NJOURNAL is obviously fine but it is not an official guideline and so actual notability guidelines should also be used when discussing its notability (or lack there of).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:57, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete There is nothing notable about this person Barrettsprivateers (talk) 03:20, 13 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.