Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne (Blender primitive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete and redirect to Blender. Cbrown1023 21:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Suzanne (Blender primitive)

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Not particularly notable, since it's a primitive unique to the Blender platform. VirogIt's notmy fault! 03:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect into Blender. It's not individually notable, but the article is an interesting bit of Blender lore. (It desperately needs better sourcing.) Suggest a similar fate for Suzanne Awards also. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 05:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable independent of Blender, doesn't have sufficient length to justify a fork. Also is an unlikely search term, and the Suzanne diambiguation page already has a link to the Blender article. Lyrl  Talk C 18:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No WP:RS for notability independent of Blender (software). Merge any usable content with Blender (software). --Shirahadasha 21:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This is an invalid vote. We cannot merge and delete per the GFDL as it removes attributions. It has to be one or the other. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 21:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, AfD is not a vote, but a discussion. The above comment by Shirahadasha does seem self-contradictory & may be best regarded as a merge opinion.  Of course, only Shirahadasha knows for sure.  --Ssbohio 06:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - there might be some useful opinions expressed here: Talk:Blender (software), in which I participated (though I did not tag the articles originally). In regards to Shirahadasha's vote, it's a convention I've seen in other AfDs, typically used to mean "delete, but move any applicable information first." VirogIt's notmy fault! 07:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I found this article by doing a search with Google, and found it to be valuable. Since this is Blender's version of the Utah Teapot, I see no reason that it shouldn't have its own page. Omeomi 22:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - refer to other WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Addhoc (talk • contribs) 2007-01-21T16:00:53 (UTC)


 * Delete unless sourced... Addhoc 15:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.