Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne Khan

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.  Grue  13:14, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Suzanne Khan
NN Dismas 01:38, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No claim to notability except being a relative to someone barely notable.  That, by itself, does not make one notable.  --A D Monroe III 03:10, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not a proper subject of biography in an encyclopedia, and the article is not a biography.  Were her husband very famous in anglophone nations, a redirect to him would take the place of this article.  As it is, just delete. Geogre 05:45, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Ugh systemic bias :( Kappa 07:27, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * India is an Anglophone nation given that English is an official language of India. Given that our Indian English states that approximately 11% of the Indian population spoke English as at 1991 with numbers growing since then, there are well over 100 million English speakers in India which is approximately twice as many as in England. Bollywood films are popular in other nations notably England. Having said that, this article does not establish notability for Ms Khan as opposed to her husband, I vote to Redirect to Hrithik Roshan unless Ms Khan has some record of achievement in her own right. Capitalistroadster 07:51, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect, article as is is substub, doesn't establish any notability. - Mgm|(talk) 11:13, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete – at least not notable now. --Bhadani 17:09, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I dislike retaining redirects for nns; it's like saying "you can have an article if you're notable, you can get deleted if you're non-notable, but if you move in the right circles, you can have a redirect". -Splash 21:18, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete patently nn. ---CH (talk) 07:59, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect as her husband is very famous in one of the world's largest Anglophone nations. Though I'm tempted to add that if Victoria Beckham can get her own article, any wife should... Vizjim 09:53, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Victoria Beckham? I'll be the first to say that I'm not a fan of the Spice Girls but she has a bit more notability than just for being David Beckham's wife. Dismas 10:48, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Depends on how notable you feel "Well-Known Spice Girls Video Background Dancers", "Great Vocoder Users" and "Professionally Thin People" are... ;) Vizjim 14:12, 12 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Weak redirect per Capitalistroadster, mainly because she's mentioned in her husband's article. But I tend to agree with Splash's criticism of the system.  Barno 20:14, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Agree. &mdash; flamingspinach | (talk) 18:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.