Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzhal: The Vortex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Suzhal: The Vortex

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Suzhal: The Vortex

Non-notable upcoming television series which is too soon. There is nothing in this article that indicates web notability, television notability, or general notability. There is not enough information to be encyclopedic, and no mention of what third parties have said. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:14, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Tamil Nadu. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:14, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Expanded it, added many RS, its very notable, will expand it more, its a stub now. Panda619 (talk) 05:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'd say GNG is passable with even enough English sources out there covering the trailer. Variety, Deadline, & Collider. Usually have to deep dive into foreign language news sites, but this was easy enough. Other sources are available in India and worldwide.   . Releases in a week, too soon would be if it started filming in a week. WP:NODEADLINE so stub quantity of information doesn't make it unencyclopedic. I haven't gone through foreign language sources yet, so don't know what other information is out there. WikiVirusC (talk) 10:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The coverage in Variety and Deadline are particularly significant. Other coverage is continuing to grow, it is always a good sign when I google the subject and sources have been added as recently as 24 hours ago. It is not too soon, I agree with WikiVirusC, TOSOON does not prevent an article being written before media is released, there are just certain strings attached which this article clearly meets, the most obvious of which is notability and verifiability. MaxnaCarta (talk) 11:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.