Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzi Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Suzi Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Declined speedy as makes a claim of notability. Doesn't appear to be enough here for that but let's see what others think. Black Kite (talk) 22:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete one role doesn't make her notable. WP:TOOSOON — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cylon B (talk • contribs) 08:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Non-extra role in one of the largest Indian films of all time. South Nashua (talk) 14:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello. Could you please mention which guideline you might be referring to? Thanks. Lourdes  10:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep because recently she sign 2-3 indian television show and 1 more Indian film. Vakasahmad08 (talk) 03:59, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello. Could you please provide the reliable sources confirming this? Thanks. Lourdes  10:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * yes, she already done young character role in two indian televison and work in brand advertisement Thanks Vakasahmad08 (talk) 11:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. But where are the reliable sources confirming the same? The YouTube link you've given is not reliable, and anyway does not have any in-depth information on the subject. Would you have any reliable sources? Thanks. Lourdes  13:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * you can search on google just her name 'Suzi Khan' you will get the results with lots of reliable sources including biggest indian website The Times of India Vakasahmad08 (talk) 04:54, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you please give the link here? There is no such source that I have been able to find. Thanks. Lourdes  04:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment The girl did have a main role with one of the biggest actors in India in arguably the biggest grossing film of the year. But the subject does not have reliable sources to support BIO/GNG/BASIC. All sources available on the net or mentioned in the article are trivial, and don't describe her life, background et al. The only source mentioned in the article that covers her beyond triviality is from some website called freemonkey.com. Neither does the subject qualify on NACTOR, which requires either multiple roles or requires a cult following of fans, or a massively innovative contribution. The subject doesn't qualify on any of our guidelines. Moving away from guidelines (and I can understand how India-based editors might find this comment strange) I admit that seeing the trivial news reports and seeing the comments therein, it seems everyone in India knows that a child actor acted in the movie. But it doesn't seem that anyone knows her name or would recognize her face if they were to see the artiste anywhere. I'm just giving this comment because sometimes, there are artists regionally who are absolutely well known (in the sense, everyone knows their name, recalls their face) but don't have English sources. That doesn't seem to be the case here. If some editor can get in-depth sources to qualify her on GNG/BIO/BASIC, the story here would change. Lourdes  03:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep she got role in one of the biggest indian movie of all time. IVickyChoudhary (talk) 03:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello. Which guideline does that come under? It would help if you can mention the guideline and provide reliable sources to support that. Thanks. Lourdes  03:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I've failed to find reliable sources; all the keep comments above are devoid of any guideline based argument. Not one reliable source has been provided till now. The subject fails GNG/BIO/BASIC/NACTOR. Lourdes  14:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to be WP:TOOSOON based on a small film part when she was 3. Being plucked from an audience to appear in a film because she cried seems a flimsy claim to enduring notability. The news coverage (as opposed to film blogs) contains scant biographical info. Sionk (talk) 13:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – also think this is a case WP:TOOSOON; could be recreated in a few years if she remains active and doesn't drop of the radar. United States Man (talk) 21:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.