Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzi Pomerantz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It looks like there is no actual evidence of significant coverage, just the assertion that it does exist and sources that appear to be passing mentions. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Suzi Pomerantz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another spammy PR/auto biography of yet another motivational speaker, with yet more references based on press releases. Guy (Help!) 14:01, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  15:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  15:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


 * delete a non-notable "executive coach".John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * keep Ms. Pomerantz is a very notable business woman, contrary to what John Pack Lambert claims. She is one of the top leaders in her field of executive coaching having received numerous awards over many years. Her references include the Washington Business Journal, Washington Post, Forbes, and Smart CEO Magazine, among others.

She is not a motivational speaker and her references are not based on press releases, as Guy claims. Does her article say "motivational speaker?" No, it does not. Why would you make these things up?

I’ve read that it is hard for a woman business person to get a Wikipedia page. Perhaps it’s true that there is bias against women having pages on Wikipedia. Flyingbrook (talk) 14:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC) — Flyingbrook (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * No, only against people abusing Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Guy (Help!) 18:34, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Her references include the Washington Business Journal, Washington Post, Forbes, Smart CEO...
 * Going by titles alone: passing mention; passing mention; Not Forbes, a press release from a affiliated service; passing mention. It's called "Churnalism, chum. --Calton | Talk 02:55, 31 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Calton | Talk 02:55, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The entire article is heavily promotional and designed to exalt the individual it is about, not inform readers about non-existent encyclopedia worthy notable information. The creator of the article also tried to use alleged sexism against women on Wikipedia as an excuse to save the article from deletion. Newshunter12 (talk) 11:38, 31 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.