Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzie Wylie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Wikiacc (talk) 00:38, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Suzie Wylie
Student vanity. Only claim to fame is running for president of the National Union of Students of the United Kingdom. R. fiend 16:23, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not yet notable enough.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  16:53, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * No vote, I'll abstain from voting becasue she's a friend so I'm not realy neutral. I've beefed the article a bit and included some referances. On the plus side she does hold a national position in the NUS (on block of 12). On the downside so have many people who definatly don't deserve an encycopedia article. She is doing a toor with Gorgous George mabey this will be enough to push her into the relem of the political gliteriti, maby not. In defence of her modesty I don't think it was her who created the page though I can't be sure. --JK the unwise 17:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete student with some activism activity. Good for her for getting involved, but it isn't the sort of thing that gets an encyclopedia article. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  17:58, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Student activists who aspire to mainstream politics just ain't notable. Eddie.willers 19:22, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as her achievements thus far centre on student activism and peripheral political achievement. I wish her luck for the future, though. Sliggy 23:41, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have to agree with the prior justifications, including the characterizations of Ms. Wylie as someone of TREMENDOUS potential. I think she will qualify for Wikipedia one day and we will welcome her with open arms.  I just don't think she qualifies as sufficiently notable at this time. el_amante 20:40, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * No vote, again I know her (a bit); the article looks quite decent now and is probably verifiable, but there is the notability issue. Warofdreams talk 09:49, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.