Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzy Cohen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. TravellingCari 21:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Suzy Cohen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Autobiography of a pharmacist which is not notable because there is nothing to prove notability. Also, there is some POV issues in the article that needs to be addressed. Tavix (talk) 13:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. She's more than just a pharmacist. A search in OCLC's WorldCat for Suzy Cohen as an author turns up a number of records indicating wide publication history; a number of her books have even been translated (at least one into Spanish). Also, the first listed work (The 24-Hour Pharmacist 2007) is in its third edition, with 161 libraries owning that title. POV issues do exist, but this would indicate a need for improvement rather than deletion. I have no affiliation with Cohen or her works (I am not a fan). --Quartermaster (talk) 13:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  14:29, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as notability is available. Lack of sources is not a reason for AfD. Quartermaster is correct.. the article cries for improvement, not deletion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable author. Google buries me in pages about her books. I made a start with copy-editing the article and adding sources.   SIS   22:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.