Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzy Kellems Dominik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ of the slightly weak variety. WP:HEY has occurred here and the general consensus post-rewrite, including some changed !votes, is that article should be retained. Hard to judge consensus though when articles change this much during discussion, hence the slight qualification on my keep closure. Daniel (talk) 09:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Suzy Kellems Dominik

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. Seems more like WP:PROMO. Full of generic embedded links. Article history shows the article was created by banned editor Masterknighted. Other SPAs involved with edits. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Arts, and Visual arts. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:46, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is what I thought when I tagged it as UPE and proposed deletion in 2018. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California, New York,  and Wyoming.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Emotional and known for her fiercely confrontational work, reads like PROMO right off the bat. Oaktree b (talk) 03:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete : Little sourcing found for the individual mentioned here. Gscholar is five hits, all to the Mark Morris Dance Group. Nothing else found we can use for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 03:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm unsure if this is the same person, , this one art display caused quite a stir in the press. I can't tell if it's the same person the wiki article is about though. Oaktree b (talk) 03:09, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. This is an in-depth professional profile, and can't continue its current state. (Update: keep per WP:HEY) Subject appears to be of borderline notability, with a fair amount of coverage in Women's Wear Daily, eg, and verifiable exhibits eg and . The specific exhibit Oaktree mentions above itself has quite a bit of coverage. I could see an article being drafted and going through AfC if someone is willing to do a bit more research. &mdash;siro&chi;o 04:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep but send to draft if possible. Wow this is promo.With new sourcing above, I've reconsidered. Struck my other vote above. Oaktree b (talk) 15:46, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, the only thing that should be decided here is if she is notable, which she seems to be from adequate sourcing. Lack of museum collections shouldn't weigh against her, as her main work looks to be exhibitions. I've done a bit of clean-up of the styling and promotional language, more is needed but should not be decisive to this discussion. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Article has been rewritten with stronger sourcing. Most of the concerning article text, especially those not supported by sources or those only supported by official sources, has been rewritten or removed. Bridget (talk) 02:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Sourcing has improved, with multiple examples of reliable sources giving significant coverage. Thank you, Bridget, for removing all of the ridiculous promotional text, like being an "emotional autobiographer known for her fearlessly confrontational work." Elspea756 (talk) 07:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.