Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzy Sachs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Suzy Sachs
Notability appears to be somewhat questionable. IMDB entry shows that whoever wrote the article probably inflated her involvement in projects, as vandalous anon pointed out. Mild delete. --Nlu (talk) 05:38, 9 February 2006 (UTC) http://www.onemodelplace.com/member.cfm?ID=120203 http://www.crystallizeyou.com/resumes/actingresume.pdf http://dp.dynamicfilms.us/ http://www.jillev.com/http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:A_5Y72NpsyQJ:www.crystalizeyou.com/resumes/actingresume.doc+%22suzy+sachs%22+glory+daze&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=9Resume.htm --SuzySachs 08:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V. --Aaron 07:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above.Blnguyen 07:15, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above.--み使い Mitsukai 15:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Avi 16:46, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 19:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This is my first post... heard about this little dialogue with anymous (IR). anonymous isn't as anonymouse as he thinks. he is however bent on harassing and slandering while trying to hide the truth about who he is.  His information is not accurate. Check out these direct SOURCES NOTING SUZY SACHS AS DIRECTOR AND CREATOR OF GLORY DAZE.
 * Think you should declare an intrest here Suzy! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Talk!) 08:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - and we should look at the article on her husband as well. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Talk!) 08:14, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Good resume material, but not enough here to satisfy WP:BIO and I can't find enough to corroborate these claims from independent, trusted sources elsewhere on the Web. I see a hint of vanity here as well.  On the bright side though, if her userpic was taken anytime recently, she can console herself with the fact that she had 5 children and still looks damn good.  That's gotta be worth something.--Isotope23 18:48, 14 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.