Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sven Erlandson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Sven Erlandson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

After a WP:BEFORE, I don't think this person is notable. They should be mentioned in Spiritual but not religious, but are not notable enough for their own article. Other than being seen by some (not many, I might add) to have popularized that phrase, they've done nothing else that constitutes notability. The current article is also highly promotional, not written in an encyclopedic tone, and most of it's claims are unsourced or poorly sourced. Vermont (talk) 22:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! Baby miss  fortune 16:08, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! Baby miss  fortune 16:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete this highly promotional, kakimaze-created, inadequately sourced text about a non-notable person. -The Gnome (talk) 12:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. Ifnord (talk) 20:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.