Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

notability unclear; old age is not sufficient. Fgnievinski (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - As an old age regularly publishing scientific journal, it sounds like it would meet the criteria of BEING a reliable reference for other articles. If it could be used as a reference for other things, it would seem to me that it would be notable enough for an article of its own. We have articles on pretty much every OTHER academic journal out there.  It would be my understanding that all this article needs to do is establish that it is, indeed, an academic journal, and thus deserving of an article. Fieari (talk) 06:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I found this that could be useful to determine the impact of this journal. // Liftarn (talk)
 * Keep The journal is abstracted and indexed in Biosis Previews (not sure how selective that one is) and Scopus. The latter is becoming less selective, but inclusion in it is generally accepted as indicating sufficient notability in these AfD discussions. I have added this to the article, together with references. --Randykitty (talk) 12:45, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * With that I withdraw the nomination, if this has any effect. Fgnievinski (talk) 14:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.