Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svenska poolfabriken


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\talk 01:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Svenska poolfabriken

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This stub contains too little information about the company - just a definition and a link - and should be removed, since Wikipedia is not a phone book or dictionary For Lise 20:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Though the edit history on the article shows that For Lise had difficulty figuring out what to do procedurally with this article, her instincts were absolutely correct as to deletion.  There is no reason to have an article about this company-- that article as For Lise found it was nothing but spam and nothing can be done to make it into an encyclopedic article. OfficeGirl 20:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails Wikipedia:Relevanskriterier#Företag--Victor falk 01:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Wen li  (contribs) 02:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.  -- Gavin Collins 08:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable company. Keb25 09:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.