Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svit Sešlar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Svit Sešlar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, as per original proposed deletion: "Sourced only to a database; no evidence of notability." Snowflake91 (talk) 16:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Slovenia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment – I found a couple of foreign-language sources, however I'm not 100% certain if they'd be sufficient to pass WP:GNG or move beyond WP:ROUTINE. This source discusses him returning to his parent club, however the article is admittedly rather brief and could be considered routine. This source seems promising but is paywalled beyond the first paragraph, which seems to discuss Svit and his family (including father Simon who played internationally for Slovenia). I'll add these and several others I've found to the article to see if they serve to shift the article towards notability, but I'm not particularly experienced with AfD discussions or what passes GNG and what doesn't, so I'll leave this as a comment. User:SmackJam (talk) 19:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The first source is a yellow sports website and its just a short report that he returend from loan, absolutely no WP:SIGCOV there. The second pay-walled article is most likely not about him, but its a review of all 5 weekly games in the league according to the first sentence – would need someone to unlock the article, we cannot just assume. If suddenly the players would meet WP:GNG because they would get an aritlces like "player X was loaned to team Y", and "the player played a game and scored a goal in the 10th minute", then literally every single player out there could have an article as you would find this for every player in the top league. Snowflake91  (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback. SmackJam (talk) 19:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Its nice that you now added several sources and expanded the article, but all those sources are still WP:ROUTINE reports like him being loaned out, extending the contract, match reports, interview at club's website (WP:PRIMARY) etc. Snowflake91  (talk) 20:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.