Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swagelok


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. Yechiel Man 20:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Swagelok

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

promotional; non-notable Tom Harrison Talk 15:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Help! I'm happy to edit this article until it complies with Wikipedia's guidelines and is not promotional. Please help me understand what about the 1 line version is promotional. Also, I'd like to understand criteria for being notable --- given that this is a >1B USD firm, and that there are hundreds of Google searches per day for this company by name, I'm not seeing how it is less notable than many, many company articles on Wikipedia. Thanks! MarkReichard 15:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment I believe this is a notable company. Here are a few sources I found. They talk about the products of the company and also discuss the history. The article, is extremely short, but it can be expanded. I would suggest not copying directly off a company website.,, , , , , , . -- Cyrus      Andiron   15:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

MarkReichard 15:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Here is another link --- this one to a new technology developed by the company.


 * Speedy Keep - Okay, I'm convinced. Thanks for your work collecting the references. Tom Harrison Talk 17:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.