Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Premanand Ji Maharaj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Swami Premanand Ji Maharaj

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Even after being involved in many events and work the subject does not have significant coverage in reliable sources. Most of references in the article are either from social networking sites or self-published sources. The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO — CutestPenguinHangout 14:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Cutest<b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b>Hangout 14:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — <b style="color:#D60047">C</b><b style="color:#F0A000">ute</b><b style="color:#00A300">st</b><b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b>Hangout 14:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — <b style="color:#D60047">C</b><b style="color:#F0A000">ute</b><b style="color:#00A300">st</b><b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b>Hangout 14:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that I can find. I first thought that a "keep" argument could be made based on inherent notability for the president of a political party, but it seems like there is very little coverage (if any) for the party too, and so neither of them likely meet GNG. Vanamonde93 (talk) 13:32, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete The nominator is exactly right about the quality of sources used in the article and the ones seemingly available, and Vanamonde93 is right about the notability due to the "political party". The only mention in an RS I could find was this one, which is so trivial that we can't even be sure that it's the same person. Note that there are several other swamis with similar names, eg Swami Premananda and another Swami Premanand Ji Maharaj who was active years before the subject was born. Abecedare (talk) 13:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.