Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swapan Purkait


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion., North America1000 04:49, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Swapan Purkait

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Despite claims of notability, this autobiographical article by User:Spurkait fails WP:BIO. There is no independent coverage about the subject in either Gnews or Gbooks. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 19:11, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as clear advertising since it's all clearly company-motivated and something only they would be so keen to format and neatly start with such advertising as if it were their own "About" section, there's literally nothing beyond that so deletion is clear here. SwisterTwister   talk  05:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Autobio that fails WP:BIO no independent coverage and looks like a vanity article. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 10:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Seems like an autobio or paid spam. Not a single source available about him in either language. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  13:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: There are one or two passing mentions which is not what Wikipedia seeks for a biographical article. Anup   [Talk]  15:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete:Should have been speedied.Pure paid-spam.A next to complete absence of WP:RS. Aru@baska ❯❯❯  Vanguard 08:56, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * DEFINITELY KEEP : The page of Swapan Purkait has proper information . Regarding citations, famous websites ike DataQuest has his quotes in their articles. Using basic Google search you will be able to find it in Gnews. The individual's identity can be easily verified through channels. I don't think there's any spam in this matter and I'd request others not to use strong words of disagreement before proper investigation.I've done investigation on my behalf and I find the information to be valid . Kindly do not write any kind of allegations such as "paid-spam" before doing proper looking into the web.--Tirtha04 (talk) 13:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - this has no notability. I was content not to pile in on this one as it seemed clear cut, but in the light of the preceding comment, I can confirm that I see no merit here.  Velella  Velella Talk 13:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - appears to be resume and or curriculum vitae as drafted by advertising company of some sort. Sagecandor (talk) 02:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pure WP:SPAM. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  04:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.