Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swapnali Gaikwad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Swapnali Gaikwad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable singer with lack of coverage in WP:Independent sources. Of two sources cited, one is a link to her IMDB. A Google search shows that the sources that discuss her are mostly paid ones. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:SINGER.-- Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians,  and India. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Maharashtra.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * i have submitted news article most authentic and organic news which covered hindustan times and times of India and more she have Creadiblity
 * https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/city-student-teaches-indian-classical-music-to-students-across-the-globe/articleshow/92645418.cms
 * https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/pune-news/online-classes-to-music-label-pune-student-hits-a-high-note-on-women-entrepreneurship-101656095124778.html
 * https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/singer-swapnali-gaikwad-pays-tribute-to-veteran-singer-lata-mangeshkar-sets-a-new-world-record
 * https://www.hellomumbainews.com/hello_womeniya/taking-online-classes-to-owning-a-music-label-young-student-from-pune-swapnali-gaikwad-holds-the-bar-for-women-entrepreneurship/ Vishwajyot (talk) 11:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - The news articles listed above indicate that the person exists but they are minor local stories about her teaching practice. That does not add up to the significant coverage required here. Her movie playback credits are minimal. Also note how the article makes no claim of notability. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * after reading all articles i found she did significant work in the music teaching sector she took indian classical singing on global level
 * https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/city-student-teaches-indian-classical-music-to-students-across-the-globe/articleshow/92645418.cms
 * https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/pune-news/online-classes-to-music-label-pune-student-hits-a-high-note-on-women-entrepreneurship-101656095124778.html Vishwajyot (talk) 14:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * along with this she made 2 two world records of singing "MOST SONGS OF LATA MANGESHKAR, SUNG BY AN INDIVIDUAL" you can find here
 * https://www.highrangeworldrecords.com/tag/swapnali-gaikwad/#:~:text=The%20duration%20for%20the%20longest,Latur)%2C%20Maharashtra%2C%20India. Vishwajyot (talk) 14:42, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete more poorly sourced vanity spam, I see no evidence in the article, the sources presented here and in my own search that she is notable. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Draft:Swapnali Gaikwad should also be deleted given the creators inclination toward ignoring instructions (repeatedly removing AFD) to prevent them moving it disruptively again. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)


 * we should give them a little rope/opportunity to work on the article. If they misuse, we can use G4. —usernamekiran (talk) 05:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * No, they clearly don't follow directions. PRAXIDICAE🌈 09:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * delete came here from her newly created article on Marathi wikipedia. In the beginning it had a lot of content, but now it has been stubbed there as well, much like enwiki version. The singer fails notability criteria for singers. She does not have significant coverage in reliable sources, so she fails general notability criteria as well. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.