Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swarna Mahal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Swarna Mahal

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Don't see how this article satisfies WP:NFP; four of the sources seem to just be listings in a database, one with summary; the last one is a list of songs from the soundtrack and as such is not an independent source. Otherwise, no coverage. Iseult  Δx parlez moi 05:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 08:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not shown to pass WP:NFILM. WP:BEFORE (I searched for "Swarna Mahal" -wikipedia movie)does not reveal anything useful to me or I would have suggested incubation in Draft space. It cannot be WP:TOOSOON since it was released in 1982 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep this article has references related to leading websites and significant coverage. Abbasulu (talk) 17:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * As per my rationale, these references don't qualify for WP:RS or sources under WP:GNG. Iseult   Δx parlez moi 02:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete The nominator's characterization of the depth of the cited sources is spot on, none go beyond a summary-only description. Searches of the usual types in English and Bengali found nothing better. Wikipedia is not a database. We aim to put raw data in context by treating films in an encyclopedic manner, discussing their development, design, reception, significance, and influence in addition to providing concise summaries of them. In the absence of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, we cannot do that. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:53, 11 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.