Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swashbuckle (TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 00:28, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Swashbuckle (TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This entire article is a mess. There are no references, and while the show has only had up to Series 8, some IPs seem to have made up another 5 seasons. There are random facts everywhere with no order to them. Even if this show is notable I think the entire article needs to be rewritten because honestly it's a chaotic mess right now. RPI2026F1 (talk) 18:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. RPI2026F1 (talk) 18:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Googling finds enough sources to meet WP:NTV, I believe:, , |A527521338&v=2.1&it=r&sid=ebsco, and a seemingly non-trivial mention in a book Children, Youth, and International Television (2022). There are some decent-stub/start class versions from a year or two ago I will try to work with a bit later to bring this article closer to fine. It maybe should be deleted per WP:TNT to clear out the 4,500 or so edits, but I'm not sure that's needed. Skynxnex (talk) 22:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I looked at the edit log and there are months of edits from various IP editors. I think at this point it might honestly be best to make a stub version with the few sources, completely replace the article, and apply pending changes protection. RPI2026F1 (talk) 00:56, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Skynxnex you think this is an acceptable stub? User:RPI2026F1/sandbox/Swashbuckle (TV series). RPI2026F1 (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @RPI2026F1 Yeah! That's looking pretty good. Would you mind if I edit that some? I had done some more searching and there are good sources showing it won BAFTA and nominated for others, so including that is useful to making notability clear. Skynxnex (talk) 01:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, go ahead! Actually, I think we can replace the article now and you can edit it from there. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Done, you can edit the article directly. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Withdrawing nomination. Following WP:TNT as an alternative. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. Since I voted keep I think I am not allowed to close this but given it's withdrawn, I think an uninvolved can feel free to close this as keep/withdrawn? Thanks! Skynxnex (talk) 15:00, 15 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.