Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swati Bhatia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Swati Bhatia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability, but the main problem is that this WP:BLP has never had any sources, and the BLP Prod tag was removed without fixing that. Guy (Help!) 20:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources cited for this BLP. A quick Google did not turn up anything that would pass WP:RS and there is no evidence of notability. The article appears to be WP:PROMO by a WP:SPA. On a side note, maybe I need new spectacles but I did not see any indication a BLP-PROD was put up or removed in the edit history. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The Chief Guest of the Event, Swati Bhatia, November 2013, EUCRASIA 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stardiaries (talk • contribs) 15:21, 6 March 2014
 * Delete - no sources have been identified that approach the level of reliability and coverage described by WP:BASIC. VQuakr (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

please dont delete the article... i have attached the following print material on Swati Bhatia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stardiaries (talk • contribs) 16:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Hey guys i understand that my article Swati Bhatia was coded in AFD bcoz of the poor source but now i have collected the reliable sources to show her notability in the Indian Society. She is not an ordinary person plz try to understand in India we may not have the same notability criteria as in other part of the world but the major sourses are the Newspapers, official websites of the organization and of-course youtube.. kindly look into this matter with more open view. She is really working on the social awareness topics to help the society, i guess i can only do is to highlight her work to the public. plz help me improve the article with your expert advice. i am also thankful to VQuakr who guided me a lot... i am very new to wiki and learning a lot daily just bcoz of u all.. thanks a lot.. kindly approve the references and remove AFD tag form my article.. thanks

Swati Bhatia Rawat visit to sironj. Swati Bhatia (स्वाति भाटिया रावत) on Danik Bhaskar 2013.
 * References

Swati Bhatia chief guest of the event EUCRASIA 2013.

Swati Bhatia Rawat program.

Swati Bhatia yatedo.

Swati Bhatia rawat visit to sironj Swati Bhatia on Youtube
 * External Links

Swati Bhatia (स्वाति भाटिया रावत) on Danik Bhaskar 2013

Swati Bhatia chief guest of the event EUCRASIA 2013

Swati Bhatia program, 14 August 2013

The Chief Guest of the Event, Swati Bhatia, November 2013

Swati Bhatia yatedo


 * Comment. I have slightly edited the AfD to fix a formatting error introduced by high-level sections.  I have also moved a comment out of the header and to the body. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, promotional in tone, reads more like a fan page than an encylopaedia article, sources are trivial or primary. Guy (Help!) 12:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Before writing about the celebrities from India, i first read few articles for the references of-course from the Indian Film & Television fraternity.. i would like to reply to Guy.. who simply called my article "Fan Page" and recommended for deletion without undergoing the work and the acceptance of my subject in the Society.. I am doing more research and will only write too personal things when i have the proof to show it publicly. Wiki talk users kindly understand that India is a country of its culture and tradition... and if wiki is meant for all the kind of community then my article has all the evidence... few of my references are in the National Language Hindi so may be you people got confused by the still photograph on the news-article.. but let me explain that in the article its written about her work and her contribution towards society which is not the fan page but the information of her work.. if we will follow one mind set then we can never understand the new things happening in this world and may be a day will come when wiki or xyz will be working only for some people and community.. thanks,, i am not rude but i feel sad that when i am doing so much of research to give a new thing to  the public then why cant we indulge in the discussion with more research and knowledge??.. Swati Bhatia (talk) 10:45, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable in a global encyclopedia. The listed sources do not make noteworthy reasons to use her, some just mention her in passing. I applaud what she's done in her life, but not enough in the WikiWorld. —  Wylie pedia  12:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.