Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swati Kapila


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Disagreement about what "significant role" means, but overall, there's reasonable consensus that this wasn't. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Swati Kapila

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NACTOR. Mostly one-off appearances or very minor roles. The "recurring role" in Big Bang Theory is actually 3 appearances. The only thing close is the Bloomers role. It's actually a YouTube series, not television. Most likely a case of WP:TOOSOON. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:23, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. It was only three episodes, but it was a pretty substantial role. The Life! Camera Action... film role also seems notable, especially considering her award nomination. Lapislazulia (talk) 15:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I did consider the award, but the International Filmmaker Festival of World Cinema doesn't appear to be all that notable, so I didn't give it much weight. Remember, the standard for NACTOR is "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" I'm not sure a 3 episode appearance and a nomination for a non-notable award meets that criteria. Again, she may be notable someday, I just don't think that day is today. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:07, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not too familiar with the film festival circuit, but the World Music & Independent Film Festival is at least notable enough to have a page (again, not too familiar with film festivals so perhaps this page is also unwarranted). Lapislazulia (talk) 17:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks a little more notable than "The Social Uprising Resistance and Grass Root Encouragement International Film Festival" Niteshift36 (talk) 17:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * "Substantial" roles are generally starring roles or a recurring role that continues for a long period so no, the actress does not have recurring roles. As for the award, she was only nominated. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 14:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:09, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:09, 17 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. No substantial body of notable work at this point. Trivial. Kierzek (talk) 18:14, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. She has had significant roles in a number of television series and movies. She has also been nominated for multiple awards.  In 2014, Kapila received an Indie Series Award normination for best supporting actress in a comedy for Bloomers.  tomburbine (talk) 01:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * There is a 3 episode appearance in a show and I'm not convinced that the Indie Soap Awards are actually notable.... that may be a good AfD candidate Niteshift36 (talk) 15:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR. As already indicated by above, NACTOR requires significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions and the subject does not meet that requirement. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 15:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete a 3-episode apparance in a multi-season show is just not a sign of notability, and nothing else here is either. Maybe if we had reliable source coverage of her role in that show I would consider otherwise, but we don't.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:50, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to meet the requirements necessary for the article to meet notability standards. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 22:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.