Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swazi Airways


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anoptimistix   "Message Me"  05:59, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Swazi Airways

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The airline never launched per this source. Does not seem notable to have an article on a tiny airline that never even operated a flight. — Sunnya343&#9992; (háblame • my work) 17:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep passes WP:GNG with multiple independent sources.--TM 19:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Transport in Swaziland. It's a failed plan for an airline, not an airline. Power~enwiki (talk) 05:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist: to discuss sources.
 * Keep - while it never launched a product, it certainly seemed to generate enough news to make it noteworthy. In my searches I found a number of news articles about it (,, , , , , , among many others). As one article noted, it was "launched with great fanfare"; it apparently died much the same way. WP:NOTTEMPORARY would suggest that the topic remains notable even if the airline ultimately failed to launch. Cthomas3 (talk) 05:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 05:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.