Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete per extended discussion. BD2412 T 18:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Sweah
29 unique Google hits, only 1 of which (WikiSaurus, which ranks alongside Urban Dictionary and Wiktionary as one of the most unreliable sources on the web) confirms this usage. So merging with "scanger", whose text it duplicates, is out of the question as well. chocolateboy 20:29, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * There are a fair number of Wiktionarians who would take umbrage at that, given the amount of effort they contribute to ensure that Wiktionary does not become UrbanDictionary. Uncle G 00:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Relisting this to generate more discussion. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 00:41, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, the definitions in the search results don't even match. -- Kjkolb 01:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as insufficiently verified. Tearlach 01:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and Kkjolb. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 06:01, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.