Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweater Whether


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Sweater Whether

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sweater Whether

Non-notable unreleased film. The film's claim to fame is that it is India's first non-environmental film whose production was carbon-neutral. The only reference is in Digital Journal, which is a reliable source, and is an interview with the producer, and so is not independent or secondary. There is no mention of significant coverage of the green production of the film, or any aspect of the film. The article only says that the film will exist. We knew that. This article was created in article space, moved to draft space, and then moved back to article space with the edit summary. Duh. That doesn't establish notability. Draftification is all right, but not moving unilaterally to draft space because that has already been done once. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Assam. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:GNG. I am unable to locate additional reliable sources. The primary contributor also appears to be connected. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 05:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails every flavour of notability by some margin. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by DoubleGrazing (talk • contribs)
 * Comment it appears the article has been moved back into draft space by the user who moved it into article space in the first place. A procedural close with an understanding that the article should not be moved into article space without the approval of an AfC reviewer might be warranted. W 42  13:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. An interview with the director is not an independent source for the film, and that appears to be the best there is as far as coverage goes. May be an issue of WP:TOOSOON given that the film hasn't even released yet, but according to what I'm seeing it's a short film with a $20,000 budget; I wouldn't be surprised if coverage for this project does not materialize at any point in the future. - Aoidh (talk) 00:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - The article was moved back to article space. My own opinion is that the moving of articles, either to a different namespace or to change the title, should be prohibited while an AFD is in progress.  Any move can be done by the closer.  That is my opinion.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC) (nominator)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.