Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swedbank kartodroms (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Swedbank kartodroms
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * Delete. Notability not established. One self-reference. Possibly an attempt to preserve Swedish Wikipedia entry by saying that there is an English article! Both. most likely, should be deleted, but our guidelines (and this Afd) only pertain to our English version. Student7 (talk) 00:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC) Student7 (talk) 00:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm loathe to say to keep this simply because it was kept at the last AFD, as that's usually a very weak rationale, but in this case it seems that notability was pretty solidly established in the previous AFD. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:29, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I wonder if the nominator actually read the previous nomination? Jeni  ( talk ) 10:26, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - The previous AfD resulted in a Keep due primarily to a promise to improve the article and add sources... Over a year later, and the improvement has not happened. No sources have been added to support the idea that this facility is notable.  Saying "this is notable" here at the AfD is not enough... you have to actually establish that notability by providing sources in the article itself. Either fix the problem or let it go. Blueboar (talk) 20:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note - The above comment was made here as a result of blatant canvassing Jeni  ( talk ) 00:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Somehow it seems that the reasoning here is something going on on Swedish Wikipedia. I don`t see any promise to improve the article in previous AfD, however the original author of the article has left a note on article`s talk about there being independent sources and if it is the main track in the Baltic States and was home of USSR team it seems notable enough. Xil  (talk) 15:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep A national track JASpencer (talk) 22:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.