Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweden's Next Top Model, Cycle 6


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) LlamaAl (talk) 00:14, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Sweden's Next Top Model, Cycle 6

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page has no sources, and seems to have little importance. Scientific Alan 2 (Click here to talk)  (What have I done?) (Me) 22:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If you would've taken a closer look, several seasons of this show (let alone of the international version of this franchise) have their own article as well. So I don't think the question of importance is really necessary here. I am now adding some sources. Keep. Shameless (talk) 22:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The fact that other stuff exists is irrelevant. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:52, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * So you want to delete all 200+ articles of this show now? This is a TV hit show of broad interest. I think that is speaking for itself. Shameless (talk) 10:45, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:09, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  20:46, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: Popular Swedish television show, organization by series is fine for a show of this level. Any merge suggestions, if appropriate, can happen outside afd.--Milowent • hasspoken  19:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Strange deletion justification, given that it is a season article for a recurring show. Tomas e (talk) 17:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.