Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swedish Touring Car Championship (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. Article was speedy delete G7'd. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Swedish Touring Car Championship (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NVG as a video game. Notability separate from the sport Swedish Touring Car Championship. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I request that this article be tagged for "speedy deletion". Nobody can provide any notability and nobody wants to contribute. The article in my mind stands as "dead end". If game enthusiasts absolutely want to discover information on this game, they can look up and search for the game on MobyGames.com. Yes, this game fails notability even though the sport it's supposedly based on is notable. I agree with you, GeoffreyT2000. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 02:37, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * "Nobody can provide any notability and nobody wants to contribute." does not sound like you are assuming good faith in the slightest. It would be more accurate to say "nobody can find any notability". And notability is not inherited so I would not expect it to gain any sort of notability from anything it's based on.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Cannot find multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS, to satisfy WP:GNG. Most hits are passing mentions or directory entries, nothing substantial. May be there is content in contemporary magazines, but we can recreate then, since there's no real content at the moment. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 14:09, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, per Videogameplayer. Article has no notability, and does not belong on Wikipedia.  People seeking to find information about the game couldn't find it on Wikipedia anyway, as the article has basically no useful content. Elliot321 (talk) 15:56, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.